I just in the last week have started to listen to a podcast based on presenting Orthodox (I am guessing Eastern Orthodox) Christianity. Their big claim is the believe their doctrine is based on apostolic teachings. In the episodes I have listened to they discuss the writings of the Church Fathers a lot (they also quote Chesterton a bit, which is always a good thing in my book).
One of the things they mentioned is that Protestants often reject any authority other than the bible. This reminded me of a story in Velvet Elvis where Rob Bell talks about a leader at his church, while trying to understand what a particular passage says, decided to throw out all the opinions she had come across and just ‘take it for what it really says’ (p. 53).
That worries me. Part of that is because if the Bible scares you, it’s doing its job. Part is because of the scary arrogance of the person involved. This passage of the Bible has been around for a while, I really suspect someone out there before us has figured out what it most likely means.
I come to the Bible to be shaped, not to shape it to fit me (at least that’s what I hope).
Another interesting thought I had when thinking about this. Reading the Bible in that way is applying a postmodern interpretation on it, saying that I am the only one who can know what it means for me.
So, if you are trying to read the Bible for ‘what it really says’, you can be looking at it with postmodern sensibilities.
I’m not sure which is a worse word in some Christian circles, liberal or postmodernist.
Just think about it.